United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
APRIL J. MCKENZIE-HALL, Plaintiff,
BARRACK OBAMA, et al., Defendants.
OPINION & ORDER [RESOLVING DOC. 1, 2, 3]
S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
se Plaintiff April J. McKenzie-Hall brings this action
against defendants Barrack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the FBI,
Tanya Borich, and Gus Bey. Plaintiff seeks to proceed with this
action in forma pauperis,  and for the appointment of
counsel and to add an additional party.
motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. For the
reasons that are described, this action is dismissed.
Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel and to add
an additional party is moot and is denied.
allegations are difficult to understand and her claims are
difficult to understand. According to the Complaint,
Plaintiff's husband was forced into an adulterous
relationship to cover up wrongdoing done to Plaintiff,
including “womb kidnapping.” According to
Plaintiff's Complaint, certain individuals forced a
separation of Plaintiff from her children for the false
reason that she is schizophrenic.
claims that she is unable to see her children or husband and
her husband's family will not inform her as to their
location. She alleges that “they” have placed
illegal microphones in the teeth of her husband and children,
and that certain individual are threatening to murder her,
her husband, and their children. Somehow, she attributes this
conduct to President Obama and Hillary Clinton due to
“due to free inventions” found in her
pro se pleadings are liberally construed,
Court is required to dismiss an in forma pauperis
action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) if it fails to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted, or if it lacks an
arguable basis in law or fact. A claim lacks an arguable basis
in law or fact when it is premised upon an indisputably
meritless legal theory or when the factual contentions are
clearly baseless or rise to the level of the irrational or
Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard articulated in
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly,  and
Ashcroft v. Iqbal,  governs dismissal for failure
to state a claim under §
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). A cause of action fails to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted when it lacks plausibility
in the complaint.
Civ. P. 8(a)(2) governs basic federal pleading
requirements and requires that the pleading contain a
short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
pleader is entitled to relief. In reviewing a complaint, the
Court must construe the pleading in the light most favorable
to the pro se plaintiff.
with the benefit of liberal construction, this action must be
dismissed. The Complaint provides no factual content or
context from which this Court may reasonably infer from
Plaintiff's incredible factual allegations that
Defendants violated Plaintiff's rights. Because the
Complaint lacks an arguable basis in law or fact and fails to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted, it must be
dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
foregoing reasons, this case is dismissed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and is closed. Plaintiff's
motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.Plaintiff's motion for appointment of
counsel and to add a party is moot and denied as
Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3),
that an appeal from this decision ...