Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Ursic

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Harrison

December 9, 2019

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BENJAMIN URSIC, Defendant-Appellant.

          Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Harrison County, Ohio Case No. CRI 2017-0083

         JUDGMENT: Affirmed.

          Atty. T. Owen Beetham, Harrison County Prosecutor and Atty. Jeffrey J. Bruzzese, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Plaintiff-Appellee

          Atty. Rhys B. Cartwright-Jones, for Defendant-Appellant.

          BEFORE: Cheryl L. Waite, Gene Donofrio, David A. D'Apolito, Judges.

          OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

          WAITE, P.J.

         {¶1} Appellant Benjamin Ursic appeals his conviction and sentencing on two counts of felony assault on a police officer, and one count of failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer, in the Harrison County Common Pleas Court. Appellant argues the offenses should have merged for sentencing and challenges the sufficiency and weight of the evidence at trial. Based on the following, we conclude the offenses are not allied offenses of similar import and the trial court was correct when it did not merge the convictions for sentencing. Moreover, the evidence presented at trial was sufficient and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's assignments of error are overruled and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

         Factual and Procedural History

         {¶2} On June 4, 2017, at approximately 3:00 a.m. Appellant's neighbor, Howard Landkrohn ("Landkrohn"), called police after hearing two gun shots coming from Appellant's residence. While still on the phone with the dispatcher, Landkrohn observed Appellant drive away from his residence in his white Jeep. Landkrohn described his neighbor's Jeep to the dispatcher, including that it had a broken tail light. While en route to Appellant's residence, Harrison County Sheriff's deputies Tony Sedgmer and Ben Chaney, driving separate police vehicles, spotted a white Jeep sitting at an intersection as they approached on U.S. Route 250. A dash camera video from Deputy Chaney's police cruiser was admitted at trial and shown to the jury. The video shows that the deputies slowed as they approached the intersection and Deputy Sedgmer aimed a spotlight in the driver's side window. Being familiar with Appellant from previous interactions, he recognized Appellant as the driver. Both deputies immediately activated their lights and sirens and attempted to surround Appellant's vehicle. Appellant slowly emerged from the intersection on to U.S. Route 250. He proceeded to maneuver around the two police vehicles and quickly sped off. The video shows the damaged tail light on the Jeep as noted by Landkrohn in his 911 call. Appellant fled on Route 250 for a short time before turning on to a nearby dirt road and then cutting through a field filled with boats and vehicles to get back onto North Bay Road. The pursuit continued on North Bay Road, a residential neighborhood, for about three minutes at approximately 70 mph before the deputies radioed that they were calling off the chase to avoid a traffic accident.

         {¶3} The deputies drove to Appellant's residence where Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Rangers were interviewing Appellant's girlfriend. They continued their investigation there until another call came in that a vehicle matching the description of Appellant's Jeep was sitting at the top of a hill on an old logging road in the woods with its headlights on. While this road was now used by ATVs, it was not open to vehicular traffic. Both deputies and Ranger Troy Noice drove to the logging road. They all exited their vehicles. The deputies walked ahead, periodically switching their flashlights on and off in an attempt to see where they were going but avoid detection. Ranger Noice was farther behind them but was wearing a body camera which recorded a portion of the incident. The recording was admitted at trial and played for the jury. The deputies continued walking side-by-side up the road until they could see a white Jeep facing downhill towards them with the engine running and the headlights on. As they approached within approximately 50 yards from the Jeep, Appellant was spotted inside. According to the testimony of Deputy Sedgmer at trial and as can be seen on the body camera video presented to the jury, Appellant began driving towards the deputies, revving the engine. Deputy Sedgmer ordered Appellant to stop. Appellant continued down the hill toward the deputies, forcing them to take cover behind nearby trees. Appellant continued driving downhill toward the deputies until swerving off the road and hitting the tree the deputies were hiding behind. After hitting the tree, Appellant reversed direction on the road and attempted to flee back up the hill in the opposite direction from where he had come. He eventually abandoned the vehicle and fled on foot. Appellant was apprehended later that morning by Ranger Noice as he was walking in Landkrohn's backyard.

         {¶4} On December 11, 2017, Appellant was indicted by the Harrison County Grand Jury on two counts of felony assault on a police officer in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(2) and (D)(1)(a), felonies in the first degree; and one count of felony failure to comply with an order of a police officer in violation of R.C. 2921.331 (B) and (C)(5)(a)(ii), a felony of the third degree. The matter proceeded to a jury trial on October 4, 2018. Appellant was found guilty on all counts. The trial court sentenced Appellant to four years of incarceration on each conviction for assault on a police officer and one year for failure to comply, to be served consecutively, for a total stated prison term of nine years.

         {¶5} Appellant filed this timely appeal.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 1
CONSECUTIVE [SIC] SENTENCES WERE MANDATED AS THE APPELLANT'S CONVICTION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY SHOULD HAVE MERGED INTO HIS CONVICTIONS OF FELONIOUS ASSAULT ON POLICE OFFICERS.

         {¶6} In Appellant's first assignment of error he claims consecutive sentencing was erroneous, here. He challenges his sentence, contending that his sentence for felony failure to comply should have merged with his sentences for felony assault, because they are allied offenses of similar import. Appellant contends that the felony assault on a police officer came as he was attempting to flee, and thus his convictions for failure to comply and for assault on a police officer stem from the same, single event and should have been merged.

         {¶7} In response, the state argues that after Appellant originally fled the scene and the pursuit by police halted, this resulted in one completed action, resulting in a charge for failure to comply. The two charges of felony assault on a police officer occurred when Appellant later drove his vehicle at police until they took cover behind a tree and Appellant intentionally struck the tree with his vehicle. The state argues this is reinforced by the fact that, rather than following his trajectory of continuing down the hill to the main road after striking the tree with his vehicle, Appellant attempted to flee by turning around and driving back up the hill in the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.