Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. Claire

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Richland

June 21, 2018

ALICIA JOHNSON, ET AL. Plaintiff-Appellees
v.
BRIDGETTE ST. CLAIRE Defendant-Appellant

          Appeal from the Richland Common Pleas Court, Case No. 2015 CV 1083

          For Plaintiff-Appellees NO BRIEF FILED

          For Defendant-Appellant NICHOLAS D. ATTERHOLT Weldon, Huston & Keyser, L.L.P.

          JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J.

          OPINION

          HOFFMAN, P.J.

         {¶1} Appellant Bridgette St. Claire appeals the judgment entered by the Richland County Common Pleas Court awarding Appellees Alicia and Robert Johnson damages in the amount of $48, 385.11 on their claim for breach of contract.

         STATEMENT OF THE CASE[1]

         {¶2} On August 28, 2015, Appellees filed the instant action against Appellant, setting fourth six counts in their complaint: Count One, breach of an oral promise to repay money; Count Two, unjust enrichment; Count Three, assault; Count Four, defamation; Count Five, forgery; and Count Six, intentional infliction of emotional distress.

         {¶3} The case proceeded to bench trial in the Richland County Common Pleas Court on July 20, 2017. Following bench trial, the trial court issued a judgment in favor of Appellees on their claim for breach of an oral promise to repay money loaned to Appellant, and awarded damages in the amount of $48, 385.11. The court did not rule on the remaining counts set forth in the complaint.

         {¶4} It is from the August 17, 2017 Judgment Entry, Appellant prosecutes this appeal, assigning as error:

"I. THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN DETERMINING THAT THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS DID NOT BAR ANY ALLEGED ORAL AGREEMENT.
"II. THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN DETERMINING THAT A VALID ORAL AGREEMENT EXISTED BETWEEN PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE AND DEFENDANT-APPELLANT IN REGARDS TO ANY MONIES ALLEGEDLY LOANED.
"III. THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN DETERMINING THAT A VALID ORAL AGREEMENT EXISTED IN REGARDS TO THE GIFT FROM PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE TO DEFENDANT-APPELLANT OF A KUBOTA TRACTOR AND A FOUR WHEELER.
"IV. THE TRIAL COURTS CALCULATION DETERMINATION OF DAMAGES FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE AGAINST DEFENDANT-APPELLANT WAS AGAINST THE MANIFEST ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.