Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Guardianship of Thomas

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District

January 9, 2018

In re: Guardianship of Jacqueline A. Thomas, (Appellant).

         APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division No. 549364

         On brief:

          Jacqueline A. Thomas, pro se.

         Argued:

          Jacqueline A. Thomas.

          DECISION

          TYACK, J.

         {¶ 1} Jacqueline A Thomas is appealing from the Probate Court's failure to terminate her guardianship. She does not set forth a separate section delineating assignments of error, but has alleged a series of errors under the heading of "Law and Argument." Those allegations are:

THE PROBATE COURT ERRORED IN VIOLATING ORC CODES 2111.13, 2111.50, 2111.47, 2109.24, and 2101.24 by that of that trashing my motions and allowing the CONSTANT NEGLIGENCE OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY GUARDIANSHIP BOARD OF NEVER ATTENDING MY DOCTOR APPOINTMENT OR ANY VISITATIONS FOR SIX MONTHS FROM THE SEPTEMBER APPROVAL OVER ME. THE MAGISTRATES DISREGARD ANY CONCERN OF THE WARD TO GIVE ANY FAVOR TO OTHERS AND THE GUARDIAN BOARD LIKE THEY ALLOW THE CONVICTED PROBATE ATTORNEY THAT KILLED HIMSELF NAME PAUL S. Kormanik. THE MAGISTRATES AND JUDGE OF THE COURT HELPED UNTIL GETTING EXPOSED. I JACQUELINE BROUGHT THE COMPLAINT FROM THE MULTIPLE FAILURES OF THE BOARD AND THE ATTORNEY TO EVEN SHOW UP ATTEND MY CASES IN MY SUPPORT AND TAKE MY CONCERNS IN CONSIDERATION. THEY BOARD AND ATTORNEY KEEPS MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS ABOUT MY FAMILY PARTICICPATION IN SUPPORT OF ME TO GET THEIR WAY AND THE DOCTORS THAT SUPPORT MY FAMILY AND SEE MY FAMILY ATTENDING MY APPOINTMENTS WITH ME WANT IT TO STOP TO. THIS ALL LOOKS LIKE AN ATTEMPT OF SLAVEY MY THE BOARD AND PROBATE COURT TO SEPARATE FAMILIES THAT HAVE STRONG SUPPORT FOR FINANCIAL GAIN BECAUSE THEY HAVE THREATEN MY FAMILY THAT SUPPORT ME.
THE PROBATE COURT ERRORED IN VIOLATING ORC CODES 2111.13, 2111.50, 2111.47, 2109.24, and 2101.24 by that of that of trashing my motions and allowing hearings without constitutionally effective representation when the neglectful attorney Steve Mcgann did not show up for the last hearing required.
THE PROBATE COURT ERRORED IN VIOLATING ORC CODES 2111.13, 2111.50, 2111.47, 2109.24, and 2101.24 by that of that of trashing my motions and allowing the reschedule of the April hearing when they were given a motion a week before to reschedule the hearing but disregarded my medical requirements stated in the motion.
THE PROBATE COURT ERRORED IN VIOLATING ORC CODES 2111.13, 2111.50, 2111.47, 2109.24, and 2101.24 by that of that of trashing my motions and allowing the guardian board to present false statement that were recorded they made to strip the support of my family.
THE PROBATE COURT ERRORED IN VIOLATING ORC CODES 2111.13, 2111.50, 2111.47, 2109.24, and 2101.24 by that of that of trashing my motions and allowing guardian ship board to make false claims to gain control of the wards SSI social security benefits but got rejected after review of the social security administration stated Jacqueline's benefits were applied well for her food and shelter for over the 10 year decade and they preferred family management and did not like outside agencies stripping their benefits.

(Sic passim.)

         {¶ 2} The documents provided in the record on appeal indicate that Jacqueline suffers from schizophrenia and some developmental disabilities. The same document which sets forth these ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.