Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Lake
Appeal from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas. Case No.
14 CR 000525.
Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, and Teri Daniel,
Assistant Prosecutor, For Plaintiff-Appellee.
V. Rock, Jr., pro se, PID: A663-040, Trumbull Correctional
TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J.
Appellant, David V. Rock, Jr., appeals from the August 30,
2017 judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas,
denying his motion for reconsideration and motion for change
of venue. For the following reasons, the appeal is dismissed.
The present appeal stems from the March 30, 2015 judgment of
the Lake County Court of Common Pleas convicting appellant of
one count of operating a vehicle under the influence
("OVI"), a third-degree felony, in violation of
R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a) and an accompanying R.C. 2941.1413
specification for having been convicted of five or more OVI
offenses within the previous twenty years. Subsequently,
appellant has filed several postconviction motions and
appeals. See State v. Rock, 11th Dist. Lake No.
2015-L-047, 2015-Ohio-4639; State v. Rock, 11th
Dist. Lake No. 2016-L-011, 2016-Ohio-8516; State v.
Rock, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2017-L-010, 2017-Ohio-7294;
State v. Rock, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2016-L-118,
The record reflects that appellant filed a motion to withdraw
his guilty plea pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 on May 16, 2017,
which the trial court denied on July 19, 2017. No appeal from
that judgment was taken.
On July 31, 2017, appellant filed a motion for
reconsideration, and on August 8, 2017, appellant filed a
motion for change of venue with the trial court. The court
denied both motions in an order filed August 30, 2017.
Appellant filed a notice of appeal from that order on
September 27, 2017.
The Ohio Constitution grants courts of appeals
"jurisdiction as may be provided by law to review and
affirm, modify, or reverse judgments or final orders of the
courts of record inferior to the court of appeals within the
district[.]" Article IV, Section 3(B)(2). "An
appellate court can review only final orders, and without a
final order, an appellate court has no jurisdiction."
Supportive Solutions, LLC. v. Electronic Classroom of
Tomorrow, 137 Ohio St.3d 23, 2013-Ohio-2410, ¶10
A trial court's order denying a post-sentence motion to
withdraw a guilty plea pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 is a final,
appealable order. State v. Erich, 11th Dist.
Ashtabula No. 2016-A-0056, 2017-Ohio-8528, ¶12, citing
State v. Damron, 4th Dist. Scioto No. 10CA3375,
2011-Ohio-165, ¶7, citing State v. Kramer, 10th
Dist. Franklin No. 03AP-633, 2004-Ohio-2646, ¶3-5. A
motion for reconsideration of a final, appealable order is a
nullity. Pitts v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 67 Ohio
St.2d 378, 379; see also State v. Cox, 11th Dist.
Trumbull No. 2007-T-0042, 2007-Ohio-4278, ¶3.
"Consequently, judgments ruling on motions for
reconsideration are a nullity and cannot be appealed."
Estate of Andolsek, 11th Dist. No. 2017-L-011,
2017-Ohio-893, ¶2, citing Pitts, supra, at 381.
Therefore, the trial court's August 30, 2017 order
denying appellant's motion to reconsider the denial of
his post-sentence Crim.R. 32.1 motion is a nullity and cannot
Regarding appellant's motion for change of venue, we note
there is no case in the trial court to which this motion
would apply. Even if there had been a case pending, an order
denying a motion for change of venue is not a final,
appealable order. Gen. Elec. Capital Corp. v. Golf Club
of Dublin, LLC, 5th Dist. Delaware No. 09 CAE 12 0107,
2010-Ohio-2143, ¶43 (citations omitted).
Because the trial court's August 30, 2017 order is not a
final, appealable order, this court is without jurisdiction
to consider the present appeal.
For the foregoing reasons, ...