Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Woody

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Licking

December 8, 2017

STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ANTHONY WOODY Defendant-Appellant

         Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2013CR00604

          For Plaintiff-Appellee HAWKEN FLANAGAM

          For Defendant-Appellant ROBERT C. BANNERMAN

          Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J.

          OPINION

          WISE, EARLE, J.

         {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Anthony Woody, appeals his April 12, 2017 conviction in the Court of Common Pleas of Licking County, Ohio. Plaintiff-Appellee is the state of Ohio.

         FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

         {¶ 2} On October 4, 2013, the Licking County Grand Jury indicted appellant on one count of trafficking in drugs (cocaine) in violation of R.C. 2925.03 and one count of possession of drugs (marijuana) in violation of R.C. 2925.11. Said charges arose from undercover drug task force work at the All Good Music Festival on July 19, 2013.

         {¶ 3} After a couple nonappearances by appellant, a jury trial commenced on April 11, 2017. The jury found appellant guilty of the trafficking count and the trial court found him guilty of the possession count. By judgment entry filed April 12, 2017, the trial court sentenced appellant to six months in prison.

         {¶ 4} Appellant filed an appeal and this matter is now before this court for consideration. Assignment of error is as follows:

         I

         {¶ 5} "THE JURY'S VERDICT WAS BASED UPON LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE AND WAS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE."

         I

         {¶ 6} In his sole assignment of error, appellant claims his conviction for trafficking in cocaine was against the sufficiency ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.