Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nami v. Nami

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District

October 26, 2017

Veda C. Nami, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Majeed S. Nami, Defendant-Appellant, Nami Capital Partners, LLC et al., Third-Party Defendants/Appellees.

         APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations C.P.C. No. 15DR-2194

         On brief:

          Sowald Sowald Anderson Hawley & Johnson, and Marty Anderson, for appellee.

          Wolinetz and Horvath LLC, and Barry H. Wolinetz, for appellant.

         Argued:

          Barry H. Wolinetz.

          DECISION

          BROWN, J.

         {¶ 1} Majeed S. Nami, defendant-appellant, appeals from the judgment entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, in which the court denied appellant's motion to vacate judgment entry/order for discovery compliance.

         {¶ 2} Appellant and Veda C. Nami, plaintiff-appellee, were married in 1978, and have three emancipated children. On June 11, 2015, appellee filed a complaint for divorce, naming appellant as defendant and 11 entities as third-party defendants. On July 6, 2015, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, claiming the trial court lacked personal and/or subject-matter jurisdiction.

         {¶ 3} On August 3, 2015, appellee served appellant a request for production of documents.

         {¶ 4} On November 6, 2015, appellant served appellee a first request for production of documents.

         {¶ 5} On December 10, 2015, the trial court issued a judgment entry denying the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint. The court clarified in a later entry that it had jurisdiction only over appellant and two of the named defendant entities.

         {¶ 6} On January 12, 2016, appellee filed a motion to compel regarding her August 3, 2015 request for production of documents.

         {¶ 7} On January 19, 2016, appellee filed a motion seeking a temporary protective order regarding ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.