United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
September 24, 2015, Petitioner filed a pro se
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (Dkt. #1). The case was referred to
Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., pursuant to Local
Rule 72.2. On December 20, 2016, the Magistrate Judge
recommended that Petitioner's application for habeas
corpus be dismissed in part and denied in part. (Dkt. # 12).
CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and
Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after
service, but Petitioner has failed to timely file any such
objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Petitioner
is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.
Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and
inefficient use of the Court's limited resources.
Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984),
aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v.
Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505
(6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d
947 (6th Cir.1981).
Magistrate Judge Baughman's Report and Recommendation is
ADOPTED and Petitioner's Writ of
Habeas Corpus (Dkt.#1) is DISMISSED IN PART
AND DENIED IN PART.
the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3),
that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good
faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a
certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §2253(c); Fed.
R. App. P. 22(b).