Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Lowery

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District

September 13, 2013

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CHARLES B. LOWERY, Defendant-Appellant

(Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court) T.C. NO. 06CR159.

APRIL F. CAMPBELL, Atty. Reg. No. 0089541, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee.

CHARLES B. LOWERY, #A536-057, Ross Correctional Institute, Defendant-Appellant.

OPINION

DONOVAN, J.

(¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Charles B. Lowery, pro se, appeals a decision of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, overruling his "motion for entry of default judgment" and his "motion for summary judgment." Lowery filed a timely notice of appeal with this Court on March 22, 2013.

(¶ 2} Lowery was found guilty in 2006 of two counts of aggravated robbery, R.C. 2911.01(A)(2), following a jury trial. The trial court imposed mandatory prison terms of four years on each count, to be served consecutively. We affirmed Lowery's convictions and the sentences they involved on direct appeal. State v. Lowery, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 21879, 2007-Ohio-6608.

(¶ 3} On May 5, 2010, Lowery filed a petition for post-conviction relief alleging that his indictment was defective and that convicting him of two identical aggravated robbery offenses constituted double jeopardy. The trial court overruled his petition, finding that it was untimely. We affirmed the judgment of the trial court, finding that Lowery's petition was untimely. State v. Lowery, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24198, 2011-Ohio-2827. We also found that Lowery could not collaterally attack his conviction and that his argument was barred by res judicata. Id. .

(¶ 4} On October 20, 2010, Lowery sent a letter to the trial court, asking the court to modify his two sentences for aggravated robbery. The trial court treated Lowery's request as a motion, which the court denied. The court found that Lowery and his counsel had been afforded an opportunity to review the pre-sentence investigation report prior to sentencing, pursuant to R.C. 2951.03(B)(2), but did not then object that the contents of the report were incorrect. The court further found that it lacked jurisdiction to modify Lowery's sentence because it is a valid sentence which has been executed. Lowery filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's judgment. We affirmed the decision of the trial court in State v. Lowery, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 24332, 2011-Ohio-3287.

(¶ 5} On December 4, 2012, Lowery filed a motion for default judgment in the trial court, asserting again that his indictment was defective. Lowery filed a supplement to his motion for default judgment on December 19, 2012. On January 14, 2013, the State filed its response to Lowery's motion in which it argued that the issues raised were barred by res judicata. Lowery responded by filing a "motion for summary judgment, contempt, and default." In an entry filed on February 27, 2013, the trial court overruled Lowery's motions.

(¶ 6} It is from this judgment that Lowery now appeals.

(¶ 7} Because they are interrelated, Lowery's three assignments of error will be discussed together as follows:

(¶ 8} "TRIAL COURT AND COUNTY CONSPIRED AGAINST APPELLANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS TO U.S.C.S. 18 §241."

(¶ 9} "STATE PRESENTED APPELLANT WITH AN UNCONSTITUTIONALLY CONSTRUCTED INSTRUMENT, TO WIT: 'DEFECTIVE INDICTMENT.'"

(¶ 10} "TRIAL COURT VIOLATED BAN AGAINST 'DOUBLE JEOPARDY' WHEN IT TRIED, CONVICTED, AND SENTENCED APPELLANT ON TWO (2) IDENTICAL AGG. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.