Seneca App. Nos. 13-10-33, 13-10-34, and 13-10-35, 2011-Ohio-4327.
Cite as 11/18/2011 Case Announcements,
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal.
Upon review of the memorandum in response to jurisdiction, it is evident that Richard W. McHugh has not filed a timely motion for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Richard W. McHugh is stricken from the memorandum in response to jurisdiction for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar.R. XII (2)(A)(6)(a) through (e).
Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire,
Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5578.
On November 3, 2011, this court indefinitely suspended respondent, Percy Squire, from the practice of law. On November 14, 2011, respondent filed a motion for reconsideration with the court. It has come to the court's attention that some of the exhibits attached to respondent's motion contain personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence of the Courts of Ohio, which have not been redacted.
It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that counsel for respondent shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk's Office and redact any and all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence, from Exhibits A through N to respondent's motion for reconsideration within ten days of the date of this entry.
State ex rel. Hayes Lemmerz Internatl. Commercial Hwy, ...