Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Steven Schmiedebusch v. Mallinckrodt

October 31, 2011

STEVEN SCHMIEDEBUSCH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MALLINCKRODT, INC., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Katz, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed September 13, 2011 in the above-entitled action. Under the relevant statute:

Within ten days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (1982). In this case, the ten-day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed. The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984) affirmed, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and adopts that Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted. (Doc. No. 14). Case closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DAVID A. KATZ U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

20111031

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.