Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ranke.

October 14, 2011

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
v.
RANKE.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Pfeifer, Acting C.J.

CAS E ANNOUNCEMENTS October 14, 2011

[Cite as 10/14/2011 Case Announcements, 2011-Ohio-5260.]

DISCIPLINARY CASES

This cause came on for further consideration upon respondent's motion to redact.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Counsel for respondent shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk's Office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence, from Exhibit B to respondent's motion for reconsideration within ten days of the date of this entry 2011-1190. Disciplinary Counsel v. Lynch,

On order of the Supreme Court of Arizona, Case No. 10-0651 David Marlborough Lynch, Attorney Registration No. 0006380, last known business address in Wickliffe, Ohio, is publicly reprimanded.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2011-1439 State ex rel. Buoscio v. Ninth Dist. Court of Appeals.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration of relator's application for dismissal, it is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O'Connor, C.J., not participating.

20111014

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.