Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sanders v. Smith Industries Aerospace & Defense Systems

October 12, 2006

ANITA SANDERS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SMITH INDUSTRIES AEROSPACE & DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Chief Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER FOR MEDIATION

The above-captioned action is hereby set for mediation at 9:15 a.m. on October 19, 2006, in the Court's Mediation Conference Suite, Room 501, at the United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 200 West Second Street, Dayton, Ohio 45402. The terms and conditions of the mediation are as follows: Designation of mediator: At the request of counsel for both parties, the undersigned will serve as the mediator in this case.

Preparation for Mediation: In lieu of the usual pre-mediation statement and in accord with the agreement of both counsel by telephone on October 12, 2006, the Magistrate Judge will take the parties memoranda on summary judgment and Joint [Proposed] Final Pretrial Order as a statement of their positions.

Attendance and Participation: Unless excused by the Court, parties or party representatives with complete authority to negotiate a settlement of the case shall attend the mediation session.

* For a party which has made a claim in the case, such representative must have final authority, in the representative's own discretion, to authorize dismissal of the claim with prejudice or to accept a settlement payment equal to the opposing party's last offer.

* For a party defending a claim, such representative must have final settlement authority to commit the party to pay, in the representative's own discretion, a settlement amount equal to the opposing party's prayer or last offer, whichever is less.

* Any insurance company which is a party or is contractually required to defend or pay damages, if any, assessed within its policy limits in this case must have a fully authorized representative present. Such representative must have final settlement authority to commit the company to pay, in the representative's own discretion, an amount within the policy limits, or up to the claiming party's last demand, whichever is less.

* Negotiations may be conducted solely by trial counsel if, but only if, counsel has been fully authorized by his or her client to pay or accept in settlement the amount last proposed by the opposing party in counsel's sole discretion.

Confidentiality: Pursuant to S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 16.3(c), all statements made by the parties relating to the substance or merits of claims or defenses made in the case, whether written or oral, made for the first time during the mediation conference or in the mediation conference statements required above shall be kept confidential by the Court, the parties, and counsel and shall not be admissible in evidence for any reason during the trial of this case. This provision does not preclude admissibility in other contexts, such as a motion for sanctions regarding the mediation conference.

Sanctions: The Court has no doubt of the good faith of both counsel and the parties in this case. Out of an abundance of caution and because of the experience of many judges in conducting mediation conferences, however, the Court notes that failure to comply with any portion of this Order is sanctionable under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f).

Michael R. Merz Chief United States Magistrate Judge

20061012

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.