Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Baker v. Lilly

October 12, 2006

JAMES K. BAKER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT LILLY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND JAMES K. BAKER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BRENDA BAKER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Terence P. Kemp United States Magistrate Judge

JUDGE WATSON

JUDGE SARGUS

ORDER

Defendants have moved to consolidate these two cases on grounds that they involve the same parties and the same common set of facts. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition. The Court agrees that the cases are appropriate for consolidation and grants the motion (#9 in Case No. 2:06-cv-606 and #12 in Case No. 2:06-cv-607). These cases are consolidated under Case No. 2:06-cv-606 (Judge Watson; Magistrate Judge King).

20061012

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.