Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Morgan v. State

September 25, 2006

JIMMY MORGAN, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF OHIO, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Chief Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations and Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. Nos. 5 & 7), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed to the Supplemental Report and Recommendations and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on September 14, 2006, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge

20060925

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.