Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lamar v. Ishee

September 18, 2006

KEITH LAMAR, PETITIONER,
v.
TODD ISHEE, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Chief Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY

This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Conduct Additional Discovery (Doc. No. 130) which Respondent opposes (Doc. No. 132). Without engaging in the fine-grained analysis of the state of Petitioner's Brady claim(s) to which Respondent has invited the Court, the Petitioner's Motion will be granted on what Respondent's counsel refers to as a "no harm to Respondent" basis (See Doc. No. 132 at 2). Petitioner may depose Lieutenant Howard Hudson of the Ohio Highway Patrol on the existence vel non of additional prisoner statements. Said deposition shall be taken not later than October 15, 2006. The time within which Petitioner shall file any motion for evidentiary hearing is extended, sua sponte, to and including November 1, 2006.

Michael R. Merz Chief United States Magistrate Judge

20060918

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.