Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Allen v. Ohio Dep't of Job and Family Services

August 10, 2006

TERINA ALLEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: George C. Smith, Judge United States District Court

JUDGE SMITH

Magistrate Judge King

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Ohio Department of Job & Family Services and Thomas Hutter's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (Doc. 7). For the reasons that follow, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.

Defendants argue that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Title VII claim against Defendant Hutter and her state law claims against ODJFS and Hutter and therefore they are entitled to judgment on the pleadings in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). Plaintiff has filed a response to Defendants' Motion, but does not oppose it. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is therefore GRANTED. Defendants are entitled to judgment on all claims asserted against Defendant Hutter and the state law claims asserted against ODJFS.

Therefore, the remaining claims in this case are the Title VII claims against ODJFS set forth in the Complaint as Counts I, II, and V.

The Clerk shall remove Doc. 7 from the Court's pending motions list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20060810

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.