Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Landrum v. Anderson

August 10, 2006

LAWRENCE LANDRUM, PETITIONER,
v.
CARL S. ANDERSON, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Chief Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING RESPONDENT ANDERSON'S OBJECTIONS AND APPEAL (Doc. #218) FROM THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #205) AND ADOPTING THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN ITS ENTIRETY

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Respondent Anderson's Objections To and Appeal From the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation That Respondent's Motion To Alter or Amend Should Be Denied. (Doc. #218.) Petitioner Lawrence Landrum filed a Memorandum Contra. (Doc. #221.) Therefore, Respondent's objections are ripe for decision.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Respondent Anderson's objections to the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are not well taken and they are hereby OVERRULED. Accordingly, the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED in its entirety. Respondent Anderson's Motion To Amend is OVERRULED.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Tenth day of August, 2006.

THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20060810

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.