Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rankin v. United States

June 8, 2006

PRINCE ALBERT RANKIN, III, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: S. Arthur Spiegel United States Senior District Judge

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's Second Motion for Reconsideration Pursuant to Rule 59(e), of Judgment Entered on April 18, 2006 (doc. 188), and the Government's Second Response to Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider Denial of Rule 60(b) Petition (doc. 190).

Petitioner requests the Court to reconsider its April 18, 2006 Order finding no basis for reconsideration of the conclusion that Petitioner is not entitled to equitable tolling for a late filing of a habeas corpus petition. The government responds that this Court's previous Order fully addressed the issues in Petitioner's present motion, and found no exceptional circumstances meriting the requested relief (doc. 190).

Having reviewed this matter, the Court finds the government's position well-taken. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner's Second Motion for Reconsideration Pursuant to Rule 59(e), of Judgment Entered on April 18, 2006 (doc. 188).

This matter is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED.

20060608

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.